Constructing an Ugly 1:1 RF Choke Balun 10

Ugly Choke BalunWhile constructing my multi-band dipole it became apparent that an ‘Ugly Balun’ or to be more precise a 1:1 RF Choke balun would be needed. I’m cheap, so not wanting to pay for a commercial balun i decided to build my own.

Why would this be needed? Well a dipole is a balanced antenna while the coax is an unbalanced feedline, the ugly balun is used to match the unbalanced coax feedline to the balanced antenna. The purpose of this to help eliminate RF currents from flowing on the outside of the coax, this ultimately ensures that the dipole is radiating the majority of the RF and not your feedline. If you were to use a balanced ladder for your feedline then you wouldn’t need to use such a balun.

I have also had problems with stray RF causing my PowerSDR to crash on my laptop while using my FlexRadio Flex-3000, so anything that could reduce stray RF emitting from anywhere except the antenna would be useful.

Materials Used

The emphasis around making the balun was to both learn something new but to also save money. I used the following components to construct the balun which i had around the house or purchase from eBay:

  • Empty 2 litre drinks bottle (this acts as a former to wrap the coax around)
  • 22 feet of RG8 coax
  • 1 female PL-259 connector (to connect your feedline to)
  • 1 male PL-259 connector (to connect your dipole centre to)
  • Solder
  • Sellotape
  • String/fishing line (for mounting)

Construction Steps

1. The first step is to put the 2 litre plastic bottle (complete with lid) in the freezer for an hour. This sounds like a strange first step, but it will ensure the bottle expands and is nice and firm for wrapping the RG8 cable around.

2. Cut 22 feet (6.7 meters) of the RG8 (assuming it’s for HF use). The exact length doesn’t matter too much.

3. Solder the female PL-259 connector to one end of the RG8 cable and the male connector to the other end. This now gives us a completed RG8 cable, with the female end allowing your coax feedline to connect into and the the male connector connects straight into the dipole centre.

I would recommend testing the conductivity (using a multi-meter) of your soldered cable at this stage, before you start winding!

4. Now retrieve your bottle from the freezer (it should have inflated in the freezer and be really firm). Sellotape one end of the coax to one end of the bottle. Note the right angle the coax comes in from, this is very important:

Right angle fixing

5. Now we can start winding the RG8 cable from one end of the bottle to the other:

RG8 Coils on former

The key factor here is to wind the RG8 neatly and tightly, one coil at a time. If you scramble wind the RG8, the balun will not act as an RF choke and it will not eliminate the RF power from the outside the coax.

6. Now to finish off this balun we need to fix the other end of the cable with more sellotape:


7. We now have our completed ugly balun, at the end of this you will truly know why this is called an ‘ugly balun’!

Hanging the Ugly Balun

My balun and ultimately the dipole was to be put up in the loft, so weather proofing any off this wasn’t a concern. The balun was to be located right next to your dipole centre (as the male PL-259 connection feeds it). I hung mine up using two loops of string (fishing line would work too), one supporting one end of the bottle and the other supporting the top of the bottle (near the cap):

Ugly Balun in Loft

The end result of constructing this balun was that it removed my problem with stray RF crashing PowerSDR and it also ensured i wasn’t loosing valuable RF power before it got to the antenna. Now reducing losses is something that every radio amateur can benefit from!

10 thoughts on “Constructing an Ugly 1:1 RF Choke Balun

  1. Reply 2E0BVC Sep 15,2013 17:04

    Nice to see the old ideas still having legs 🙂

  2. Pingback: How to construct a multi-band dipole using speaker wire ← Randomize This!

  3. Reply m3wnz Nov 8,2014 12:58

    What I did was to put duck tape sticky side up and secure it in place leaving enough to rap around when coil is finished. Then slide out former and begin to rap insulating tape completly aroun from the inside to outside. Therfore giving a lot of ridgidity to the whole coil. Ideal for in and outdoor use. Then give the whole coil a few coats of Marine varnish ensuring a complete seal. Of corse you would test continuaty before doing this..Last for years and maintenance free.. Well worth putting the effort in to acheive a solid build..

    • Reply James Stevens Nov 10,2014 10:10

      Thanks for the really good tip, ideal for outdoor use and fully sealed!

      73 James M0JCQ

  4. Reply John - kf6efg Feb 3,2016 17:26

    Does it matter which direction the Balun is mounted?

    I noticed that you had it mounted horizontally; Does the Balun reduce its efficiency if it is mounted vertically?

    • Reply James Stevens Feb 3,2016 18:04

      Hi John,

      No I don’t believe it matters if the balun is mounted vertically or horizontally and either direction is fine. I mounted mine horizontally because it was the most convenient way to support it. The only important part is that the ends come away at 90 degree angles from the choke winding.

      73 James M0JCQ

  5. Reply Pedja YT9TP May 13,2017 08:08

    For dipole you need 1:1 BALUN not choke.

    BALUN has function of choke too (minimizing common mode currents) but most important role is to “convert” not balanced signal coming from rig through coax cable to balanced antenna which dipole is.

    Using choke does not hurt. It does cancel common mode currents (noise from house electrical appliances) but it does not do what is needed most, balancing signal.

  6. Reply Scott Cole May 7,2020 14:49

    I read your story and have 2 questions, 1) you said you used RG-8 coax for the chokle/balun. It looks more like RG-8X. Please verify. 2) you said you used a 2 litre drink bottle for the winding of the coax. In the photo, it resembles a 1 litre bottle. Is it a 2 litre or a 1 litre bottle?

    • Reply James Stevens Jul 20,2020 17:05

      Hi Scott,

      Apologies, I can’t remember if it was RG-8 or RG-8X. But it was definitely a 2 litre bottle!

Leave a Reply to John - kf6efg Cancel Reply




Follow by Email
Follow by Email